A Marvel Rivals player's Grandmaster I achievement sparks a team composition debate. The conventional wisdom favors a 2-2-2 team setup (two Vanguards, two Duelists, two Strategists). However, this player contends that any team with at least one Vanguard and one Strategist is capable of victory.

This advice comes as Season 1 approaches, bringing with it anticipated new characters (including the Fantastic Four) and maps. The current Season 0 is seeing a surge in competitive play, fueled partly by the pursuit of the free Moon Knight skin for reaching Gold rank. This increased competition has highlighted frustrations with unbalanced teams lacking Vanguards or Strategists.

Redditor Few_Event_1719, the Grandmaster I player, challenges the established meta. They claim success with unconventional team compositions, even using a three Duelist, three Strategist lineup that entirely omits Vanguards. This aligns with NetEase Games' stated intention to avoid implementing a role queue system, prioritizing flexible team building. While some welcome this freedom, others lament matches dominated by Duelists.

Community reactions are mixed. Some argue that a single Strategist is insufficient, leaving the team vulnerable when the healer is targeted. Others support the unconventional approach, sharing their own experiences with success. The effectiveness of a single Strategist, they suggest, hinges on effective communication and awareness of visual and audio cues, as Strategists announce incoming damage.

Competitive mode improvements remain a topic of discussion. Proposed changes include hero bans for improved balance and the removal of Seasonal Bonuses, which some believe negatively impact the game's balance. Despite these concerns, the community's enthusiasm for Marvel Rivals and its upcoming content remains strong.

(Replace with actual image if available)

(Replace with actual image if available)

Note: Image URLs are placeholders. Replace these with the actual image URLs from the original text.